Legal Software Where
Confidentiality Is The Product

A legal system is trusted with the most sensitive material a client owns, and it will one day be asked to prove exactly who saw what and when. We build for that question from the first line of the schema.

Legal work in progress
The Sector

Access Control Is Not A Settings Page

In most software, permissions are a convenience. In a firm they are a professional obligation. Ethical walls between matters, privilege that must not be waived by a careless share link, and retention rules that differ by jurisdiction and matter type.

That is why we treat access, audit and retention as the core data model rather than a feature layer. It costs a little more at the start and it is the reason these systems survive an audit, a client security review and, occasionally, a dispute.

  • Matter-level access and ethical walls enforced in the data layer
  • An append-only audit trail on every document and record
  • Retention and legal hold configured per matter, not per firm

What We Build For Legal

The systems a firm, a legal department or a legaltech product runs on.

Practice & Case Management

Matters, parties, deadlines, tasks and documents in one system, with the docketing and limitation dates that cannot be missed.

Document Automation

Template-driven drafting with clause libraries and approvals, so routine documents stop consuming senior time.

Contract Lifecycle (CLM)

Request, draft, negotiate, sign, store and renew — with obligations and renewal dates surfaced before they lapse.

E-Discovery & Review

Ingestion, deduplication, search and review workflows with defensible logging of every decision made.

Client Portals

Secure matter updates, document exchange and billing visibility, which is the single thing clients ask for most.

Time, Billing & Trust

Time capture, rate rules, e-billing formats, disbursements and client account handling that reconciles.

What Decides Whether It Holds

Legal software is judged by a security questionnaire and, eventually, by a court.

Privilege & ethical walls

Access enforced per matter and per role at the data layer, so a wall cannot be walked around by a direct link.

Immutable audit trail

Append-only history of every view, edit, share and export — the record you need when a process is challenged.

Retention & legal hold

Automatic retention by matter type, and a hold that reliably stops deletion while a dispute is live.

Versioning & e-signature

Full version history, comparison and integrated e-signature with an evidence trail attached to the document.

Conflict checks

Party and relationship checking at intake, run against the whole matter history rather than a name search.

AI with a human sign-off

Summarisation and first-pass review where they save real time, always routed to a person who approves before it counts.

What We Connect To

Firms already run a document store, an accounting package and a diary. The value is in making those one workflow instead of four logins.

Talk to our team
E-signature platforms
Court e-filing
Document management (DMS)
Legal accounting & e-billing
SSO & MFA
OCR & document ingestion
Calendaring & docketing
Email & Microsoft 365
AI summarisation & search

How We Deliver

Rolled out practice by practice, because a firm cannot pause fee earning for a cutover.

Map matters and duties

Matter types, workflows, retention duties and confidentiality requirements documented before design.

Core matter system

Matters, parties, access model and audit trail built first — everything else is layered on this.

Documents and automation

Document handling, templates, e-signature and billing added, with fee earners testing them on real matters.

Practice-by-practice rollout

One team live first with support on hand, then the rest, with historical matters migrated in batches.

Tell Us What The Firm Still Does By Hand

The intake spreadsheet, the precedent bank in a shared drive, the billing narrative typed twice. Those are usually the highest-value things to fix first.

Talk to our team
FAQs

Legal Technology Questions

What firms and legaltech founders ask us before starting.

Wherever your obligations require — a specific region, your own cloud tenancy, or on-premise if that is the condition of a client contract. We design for the deployment target from the start, because retrofitting data residency is expensive.

It is genuinely good at first-pass summarisation, clause extraction and search over large document sets. It should not produce advice or a filing without a lawyer reviewing it, so we build the review step into the workflow rather than trusting people to remember it.

In most cases yes — the common DMS platforms expose APIs, and we push documents into them instead of creating a second store. Which integration is possible depends on your specific platform and version, and we confirm that in scoping.

That is the bar we build to: SSO and MFA, encryption in transit and at rest, least-privilege access, audit logging and documented backup and recovery. We also hand over the documentation those questionnaires ask for, since answering them is usually the delay.